Driving Without Insurance (Section 143 RTA 1988) is a "strict liability" offence. This means your intent does not matter. The court does not care if you thought you were insured. It does not care if it was an honest mistake. If you were driving a vehicle on a road and no valid policy was in force, you are guilty.The penalty is sever
The "Strict Liability" Trap: Defending the Indefensible Charge of Driving Without Insurance
Driving Without Insurance (Section 143 RTA 1988) is a "strict liability" offence. This means your intent does not matter. The court does not care if you thought you were insured. It does not care if it was an honest mistake. If you were driving a vehicle on a road and no valid policy was in force, you are guilty.The penalty is sever
The "Strict Liability" Trap: Defending the Indefensible Charge of Driving Without Insurance
Driving Without Insurance (Section 143 RTA 1988) is a "strict liability" offence. This means your intent does not matter. The court does not care if you thought you were insured. It does not care if it was an honest mistake. If you were driving a vehicle on a road and no valid policy was in force, you are guilty.The penalty is sever
The "Strict Liability" Trap: Defending the Indefensible Charge of Driving Without Insurance
Driving Without Insurance (Section 143 RTA 1988) is a "strict liability" offence. This means your intent does not matter. The court does not care if you thought you were insured. It does not care if it was an honest mistake. If you were driving a vehicle on a road and no valid policy was in force, you are guilty.The penalty is sever
The War for Talent: How Business Immigration Lawyers Secure Your Competitive Edge
In the post-Brexit economy, the ability to move talent across borders is no longer just an operational advantage; it is a matter of survival. The UK’s immigration system has mutated into a complex, high-cost fortress. With the Skilled Worker salary threshold now sitting at £41,700 and the Immigration Skills Charge having rise